Background:
Survival to hospital discharge remains a critical outcome for premature and very low birthweight infants (VLBW), who often require fortification of human milk to meet nutritional needs within tolerated feeding volumes. Although exclusive human milk diets (EHMD) that include human milk-derived fortifiers have been proposed as an alternative to cow milk-derived fortification or formula supplementation, evidence for their association with improved survival remains inconsistent across studies.
Objective:
To evaluate the association between an EHMD and survival to hospital discharge among premature and low birthweight infants, synthesizing evidence from randomized and non-randomized studies.
Methods:
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through July 2025 for studies comparing an EHMD (human milk fortified with human milk-derived fortifier) with diets containing cow milk-derived products. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses by study design.
Results:
Five randomized and 9 non-randomized studies were included, encompassing 4,713 infants born between 2004 and 2021. Mean birthweights ranged from 741 to 1,361 g, and mean gestational ages ranged from 25.5 to 29.7 weeks. In pooled analyses, EHMD was associated with lower odds of death before discharge (pooled OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.98; I2 = 0%, tau2 = 0.00, p = 0.03). Directionally similar associations were observed in randomized (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.28–1.38) and non-randomized studies (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–1.03), although no significant differences emerged within either subgroup. In the two randomized trials directly comparing human milk-derived and cow milk-derived fortifiers, mortality estimates were directionally similar but no significant difference was observed between groups.
Conclusion:
EHMD was associated with lower odds of death before discharge in pooled analyses. Although no significant differences emerged in the subgroup analyses, the consistency in effect direction across study designs supports the possibility of a clinically meaningful association. Adequately powered randomized and pragmatic trials are needed to confirm this association.